Justin Baldoni’s attorneys have withdrawn a subpoena that was issued to Taylor Swift amid the It Ends With Us actor’s ongoing authorized battle with co-star Blake Vigorous.
Swift, who’s shut pals with Vigorous, had been talked about in reference to the continuing authorized case between the co-stars when textual content exchanges have been revealed that included her identify in Baldoni’s US$400-million defamation countersuit in opposition to Vigorous and her husband Ryan Reynolds in January.
Legal professionals for Swift and Vigorous beforehand filed motions to revoke the subpoena, issued earlier this month.
Vigorous’s spokesperson beforehand stated that Baldoni had tried to subpoena the pop star as a witness within the case “designed” to make use of Swift’s “identify to attract public curiosity.”
“We’re happy that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Events have withdrawn their harassing subpoenas to Taylor Swift and her legislation agency,” the spokesperson stated in a press release to Selection on Might 22.
“We supported the efforts of Taylor’s crew to quash these inappropriate subpoenas directed to her counsel and we’ll proceed to face up for any third social gathering who’s unjustly harassed or threatened within the course of.”
“The Baldoni and Wayfarer crew have tried to place Taylor Swift, a lady who has been an inspiration for tens of thousands and thousands throughout the globe, on the heart of this case since day one,” Vigorous’s spokesperson added.
“Confronted with having to justify themselves in federal court docket, they folded. In some unspecified time in the future they may run out of distractions from the precise claims of sexual harassment and retaliation they’re dealing with,” the assertion concluded.
For the reason that authorized battle started, Baldoni’s authorized crew has made textual content messages from Vigorous and Reynolds public on an internet site, titled The Lawsuit Data, created to assist defend him.
On the web site, revealed in early February, Baldoni, 41, additionally shared an amended criticism in his case in opposition to Vigorous, Reynolds, Vigorous’s PR agency and the New York Occasions, in addition to a 168-page doc, referred to as “Timeline of related occasions,” associated to the case and the manufacturing of the movie.
Get each day Nationwide information
Get the day’s high information, political, financial, and present affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox as soon as a day.
The timeline consists of emails and textual content messages that have been allegedly despatched main as much as and in the course of the film’s filming.
Textual content messages between Vigorous and Baldoni, the place she seemingly alludes to Swift as “one in every of her dragons,” have been launched in February. Swift and Vigorous have been very shut pals since 2015 and the pop star is the godmother of Vigorous’s youngsters.
In accordance to Selection, the subpoenas to Swift and her authorized crew didn’t seem like related to these explicit textual content messages.
Bryan Freedman, Baldoni’s lawyer, stated he was in search of proof that Vigorous’s lawyer had threatened to launch textual content messages between Vigorous and Swift until Swift issued a press release of help for the Gossip Woman actor, in response to a court docket submitting seen by the outlet. (World Information has not independently seen the doc.)
Freedman alleged that he obtained a voicemail on Feb. 14 from “an individual very intently linked to Taylor Swift.” He declined to establish the particular person however claimed that Vigorous’s lawyer had demanded that the 35-year-old singer submit a press release in help of Vigorous on social media and warned that he may launch 10 years of textual content messages between the pair.
Freedman additionally claimed that Swift’s attorneys accused Vigorous’s attorneys of extortion.
The unidentified particular person additionally claimed that Vigorous had advised Swift to delete their textual content messages from a number of months earlier, in response to Freedman.
Freedman stated the subpoena was to acquire the allegedly extortionate dialog in a letter to Vigorous’s lawyer.
Vigorous’s attorneys referred to as Freedman’s allegations “unequivocally and demonstrably false.”
Swift’s authorized crew beforehand stated that if Swift was subpoenaed, she wouldn’t have any data related to the authorized dispute and shouldn’t be concerned within the case.
“Taylor Swift by no means set foot on the set of this film, she was not concerned in any casting or inventive choices, she didn’t rating the movie, she by no means noticed an edit or made any notes on the movie, she didn’t even see It Ends With Us till weeks after its public launch, and was travelling across the globe throughout 2023 and 2024 headlining the largest tour in historical past,” her spokesperson stated on Might 9.
Swift’s crew stated her solely involvement within the movie was licensing a tune, which was My Tears Ricochet.
“On condition that her involvement was licensing a tune for the movie, which 19 different artists additionally did, this doc subpoena is designed to make use of Taylor Swift’s identify to attract public curiosity by creating tabloid clickbait as a substitute of specializing in the details of the case,” the spokesperson stated.
Vigorous’s authorized crew launched a press release after information of Swift’s potential involvement within the case unfold. It stated that Baldoni and his authorized crew “proceed to show a case of sexual harassment and retaliation into leisure for the tabloids.”
“It is a very severe authorized matter, not Barnum & Bailey’s Circus,” the spokesperson stated. “The defendants proceed to publicly intimidate, bully, disgrace and assault girls’s rights and reputations.”
Baldoni and Vigorous’s authorized trial is about for March 2026 in New York Metropolis.
© 2025 World Information, a division of Corus Leisure Inc.