Week 5 of the federal legal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs wrapped on Friday, June 13. The week: stuffed with extra explosive testimony from “Jane Doe,” a girl who dated Diddy between 2021 and 2024. Jane shared extra particulars about her romance with Diddy. In week 4, she famous their “resort nights,” which included intercourse with third-party male escorts. In week 5, she shared that she and Diddy allegedly took issues up a notch from there, advancing to “all-star events,” which included a number of males. Moreover, Jane detailed Diddy’s alleged coercion of her into the sexual acts, sharing extra particulars about him allegedly threatening to withhold her “love-contracted” lease cash. In the end, Jane even alleged that their relationship, and her jealousy of his a number of companions, exploded right into a bodily assault.
Elsewhere within the week, the choose denied the protection’s second request for a mistrial. In the meantime, a star visitor made a shock look in Jane’s testimony — and at court docket. Lastly, the protection closely pushed again on Jane’s testimony, sharing proof of her obvious consent within the alleged occasions.
Now, The Shade Room’s Justin Carter is reflecting on the week with trial reporters Brianne Deville and Saràn Tarawaley on ‘TSR Investigates.’
What Else Did “Jane Doe” Share In Week 5 Of The Diddy Trial?
Per Tarawaley, Jane’s testimony was marked by moments the place she recounted the nice in her romance with Diddy. For instance, she shared that he allegedly gifted her $20,000 to help together with her on-line boutique enterprise whereas paying $10,000 in lease for her house. To the general public’s shock, Jane even shared that up to now, Diddy remains to be not solely paying her lease but additionally paying her lawyer charges.
“She’s been seen on the stand, very, very emotional,” Deville defined to Carter. “…She’s positively had a little bit of a tug of warfare, particularly with the protection. There have been a few moments the place she couldn’t actually reply their questions, however she may come again with a fast comeback, and the choose form of needed to regroup…”
Per Carter, messages had been shared through which Jane shared her frustration with Diddy for allegedly making her take part within the sexual acts. Moreover, messages had been additionally shared the place Jane gave the impression to be fortunately partaking.
“It was positively a fancy character,” Taraweley defined, nevertheless, noting that Jane appeared to voice her frustration usually and overtly to Diddy — a distinction she notes from Cassie’s earlier testimony.
Was There Coercion? Or Was There Consent?
In accordance with Carter, Jane shared that 90% of the time, she was “compelled” into her and Diddy’s resort nights. Per Deville, the protection argued in any other case. In the end, the group poked main holes in Jane’s testimony.
Scroll above to observe because the trio break down the protection’s proof. Moreover, Deville shares whether or not she believes the protection is strengthening their case. Lastly, Legal professional Justin Miller returns. He shares what he thinks could be the main query the jury should resolve after it’s all mentioned and finished.
RELATED: Week 4 Diddy Trial Recap: “Jane” Takes The Stand, 24-Hour Resort Stints And $10K Ultimatums! | TSR Investigates
What Do You Suppose Roomies?