You might be listening to the Day by day Roundup right here as a part of the Actuality C Podcast. I’m your host actuality. Steve, thanks all for tuning in on this Friday as we head into the weekend. We’re gonna have somewhat bit look again at yesterday’s podcast briefly with Rachel Juarez. Additionally obtained some extra survivor speak.
David does his put up tribal council exit interview with Dalton Ross and he stated one thing that got here up on the merchants this season, and I nonetheless have the identical take as I did again then. Pilot, Pete goes to be on a brand new actuality present that’s not Bachelor in Paradise and somewhat bit extra on Jax as a result of I obtained an electronic mail based mostly on what I stated about Jax yesterday and I wanna learn it to you and reply to this individual and we’d get to all that momentarily.
So yesterday, podcast quantity 4 40 with Rachel Juarez. I do know a whole lot of you listened to it and a whole lot of you actually preferred it and. She actually broke it down in all probability extra. I imply, I suppose that’s a matter of opinion, however I assumed yesterday’s look by her was so good, and to reply the questions that she did in the best way that she did, those that you simply guys despatched in.
I assumed was very, very informative. All of her stuff about Jerris within the first 30, 35 minutes of the podcast was glorious, and I actually do suppose that. Look, I’ve not heard from Ingris exterior of the day earlier than he despatched out these tweets to say he was submitting for reconsideration as a result of after his debate with Rachel, he thought she was utterly nuts and that is the best way he wanted to go.
And then you definately heard what Rachel’s take is her concept is that he realized throughout that debate that he didn’t increase crucial factor that he wanted to boost in his attraction, which was breaking down. The allocation of charges, and he or she feels that he used that debate, however as a result of he might by no means, and this isn’t being hyperbole right here, I don’t suppose this man will ever give credit score to a girl.
I don’t suppose he’ll ever hearken to a girl who places him in his place. I imply, you return and watch that debate or hearken to that debate. Together with her, it was type of like. I type of liken it to after I was on Nick’s podcast as a result of within the second after I was recording with Nick, it didn’t come throughout as as dangerous because it did as soon as it aired.
As soon as I listened to it, like after I was achieved recording that, I used to be like, yeah, there have been some issues that I might’ve preferred to have gotten out and I felt like Nick interrupted me a pair instances, however. It wasn’t till I listened to it again after which when each single response to that was mainly destroying Nick for a way he carried out the interview.
After which I did discover out some issues after the interview that basically set me off about him. However after I did, simply taking the interview at face worth and taking it. Simply naked bones, simply the interview itself. After I listened to it again, I used to be like, man, that was worse than I keep in mind it. And that’s the identical manner I really feel concerning the Rachel and Ingris debate.
Like I knew it was dangerous within the second. Hell, I used to be texting individuals. There have been a pair texts that I despatched out throughout that. I don’t know should you see me on display, you in all probability do, however I used to be similar to, wow, this isn’t going how I assumed it might. That was one of many texts I keep in mind sending out. Nevertheless it wasn’t till I watched it again that I noticed, oh my gosh, he’s being so dismissive of her so defensive.
She’s actually questioning him. Questioning him on sure issues, and he’s beating across the bush, not answering it straight, after which getting flustered and blaming it on her and blaming it on. We have to transfer on. We have to get to a different matter. It’s like we had two hours and 20 minutes. The explanation we wanted to maneuver on.
It’s since you gave 5 and 10 minute solutions, which once more, I ought to have stepped in somewhat bit earlier as a result of on a whole lot of these 5 or 10 minute solutions, it didn’t have to be that lengthy. He simply went off on tangents and he would simply carry up a brand new level and a brand new level, and a brand new level. And also you heard me say to Rachel yesterday, and he or she’s similar to, yeah, I, he’s precisely in that interview, the best way he presents himself on his weblog, on his tweets, and on his YouTube channel.
That is the best way he’s. And God forbid anyone tells him he’s improper and says, I don’t agree with you. It’s like he didn’t agree along with her. So in his thoughts she’s completely improper. But when she didn’t disagree with him, if she didn’t, if she disagreed with him, she’s improper nonetheless like nothing, she stated. And I, and we went into that.
Each saying, look, you’re not gonna change his thoughts. He was by no means gonna change her thoughts and he or she was by no means gonna change his. However he didn’t current any arguments throughout that debate the place she could possibly be like, you already know what, David? That’s an excellent level. I see what you’re saying there. Now she would’ve fortunately achieved that.
She advised me she would’ve achieved that. She goes, he didn’t current something. He’s not an excellent debater. What he’s good at is being a grasp debater. Positive to tip your waitress, however when she had nice factors, had stuff printed out, like I stated within the podcast yesterday, I don’t suppose that David Ingris truly thought that Rachel learn the case.
I feel he thought that she was in all probability somebody like Dave Neil, you already know, not a lawyer, and simply preferred speaking concerning the case. I don’t suppose he realized she went by way of each single case that he cited in his attraction, so she got here ready. You hearken to that podcast, both yesterday’s or the controversy podcast between them who sounded extra ready, to not point out him getting flustered, him making faces.
Who stayed calm and picked up with their arguments and who did what he did, and fly off the deal with and get defensive and say, you need a cookie, and say, can we transfer on? I suppose we’ll simply comply with disagree each time. He stated, let’s comply with disagree on this. It was as a result of she introduced up some extent that was higher than his.
It’s a captivating, fascinating factor. I can’t see us ever doing that once more, simply because he’s by no means going to hear. Sure, you can say let him present his ass once more, however. I, I feel two hours and 20 minutes of him is sufficient. I don’t suppose that he would hearken to me if I stated, David, if I carry you on once more and we do that, you’re sticking to my parameters.
If I step in, it’s not as a result of I simply wish to interrupt you. It’s since you’re giving these lengthy ass solutions which are going nowhere and also you’re not answering the precise query. And once more, the largest level to with to, to David Ingris. Rachel stated it yesterday, I’ve stated it for months. If he’s not going to ever hear or have an open ear to the issues that the JFC discovered and Dave Neil discovered pre David Ingris becoming a member of the case, we’re by no means getting anyplace with him.
He doesn’t wanna hearken to it, however as Rachel stated yesterday, that’s advantageous. Should you wanna solely discuss the whole lot that. You recognize from whenever you took over, that’s advantageous, however then you possibly can’t in the identical breath, flip proper round and name Mike Marni and Greg Gillespie. Dangerous guys and horrible people. You don’t know something that they’d achieved exterior of what Laura advised you.
You haven’t seen any of the proof ’trigger you haven’t learn any of it. So you possibly can’t have it each methods in that exact state of affairs. However I hope you guys loved that yesterday. I do know I did actual rapidly on Survivor. I didn’t even carry this up final week, despite the fact that a whole lot of you introduced it as much as me as a result of it was grew to become an internet factor.
When Eva obtained the benefit on the meals problem, on the reward problem, we didn’t see, at the least, I don’t keep in mind seeing, you already know, they put the scroll in her meals, however. I missed it throughout the episode, or this actually got here out throughout an image. After the episode, every individual had a nameplate the place they had been supposed to sit down.
So it’s just like the present particularly planted it for Eva to seek out the benefit as a result of if Eva needed to sit on this specific spot as a result of it stated Eva on a plate, on a, on a placard, after which it had everybody else’s identify the place they had been supposed to sit down, and the meals and the scroll was in her meals. How would, that doesn’t appear truthful, you already know.
They ha have they addressed that publicly? Has Jeff talked about it on his podcast? I don’t know. However sure, we all know that they’ve hidden scrolls in meals earlier than, but it surely appeared like anybody can sit down and it simply was a random luck should you occur to sit down subsequent to the meals that had the scroll in it. This, they had been advised the place to sit down based mostly on the identify plates.
So, to see if that comes up afterward, if it’s addressed post-season. As soon as the season is over and folks begin asking her questions or different individuals questions and so they go on podcasts and stuff, as a result of that’s, that appears to be an unfair benefit. David did his exit interview with Dalton Ross on ew.com final evening, and as I discussed within the open, he stated one thing that occurred on merchants this summer season and it occurred once more.
He claims that Joe swore on his children that he would by no means write David’s identify down. So some individuals say that, oh my gosh, that’s such a horrible factor to do. However similar to when Danielle did it on merchants, I’m like, can we cease in a recreation the place you’re purported to outwit, outplay, outlast, manipulate the video games for 1,000,000 {dollars}?
Effectively, we all know Survivor is, we all know merchants is for like 13 cents, however in a recreation like Survivor, the sport says Outwit, outplay, outlast. Can we cease making it such an enormous deal when individuals swear on their children? As a result of nothing’s gonna occur to the children. It, it, it’s, it’s simply phrases. It doesn’t imply something. I don’t lose any kind of respect for Joe as a result of he stated that he’s enjoying a recreation.
They’re all enjoying a recreation. You gotta do what you gotta do to win. Johnny Fairplay lied about his grandma being lifeless. All people again within the day thought that was the funniest factor ever. However but should you say, oh, I swear on my children, I received’t vote for you, man, you bought my phrase in a recreation like this. No. In each in daily exercise, if in case you have somebody at work that you simply wish to inform a secret to or you’ve gotten a narrative you wish to inform, please don’t share that.
Oh no. I promise I received’t. I swear to my children. I feel that’s completely different. In a recreation the place cash’s on the road and also you’re purported to lie and outwit and outplay and outlast. I feel phrases like which are hole. I don’t suppose it issues, and I don’t, I don’t fault anybody for saying it, and if persons are nonetheless gonna fall for it.
Now that we’ve seen on two exhibits that aired in the identical 9 month interval, six month interval, two exhibits the place anyone swore on their children after which went again on their phrase. I might suppose going ahead, should you’re anyone that that occurs to in a recreation like this, possibly you don’t imagine them anymore.
That’s all I’m saying.
