
Picture by Davidoff Studios/Getty Photos
The co-conspirators have been reportedly granted immunity.
No one needs to listen to this, however Jeffrey Epstein’s case is way more complicated than it appears. It’s comprehensible that folks anticipated a serious splash — a giant listing naming all of the influential shoppers tied to his multi-nation intercourse trafficking ring. Nevertheless it’s not that straightforward. There’s no proof any such listing exists, however that doesn’t imply there aren’t co-conspirators.
Each Trump workers member, from FBI Director Kash Patel and Trump’s Legal professional Common Pam Bondi to J.D. Vance, flirted with the concept in the event that they received again into the White Home, they’d expose all of the well-known folks concerned in Epstein’s conspiracy. Pam Bondi even claimed that the shopper listing was already sitting on her desk. And when the second got here to lastly launch it? There all of the sudden was by no means a listing, and Epstein’s suicide was, in actual fact, correctly investigated and reported.
Instantly after the brand new marching orders, MAGA loyalists like Charlie Kirk rushed to X to include backlash over the transfer. Kirk went from posting clips of Bondi again in February claiming she would launch info tied to Epstein that included “numerous names,” to now parroting MAGA speaking factors, asking why, if Trump was within the “information,” Biden wouldn’t simply launch them. In the meantime, Ben Shapiro and different conservative commentators — who normally thrive on unverifiable conspiracies about vaccines — are all of the sudden urging their audiences to belief the proof and imagine what the federal government says.
BREAKING: AG Pam Bondi says “some” Epstein info together with “numerous flight logs, numerous names, numerous info” can be launched tomorrow. 👀👀
“It’s fairly sick what that man did, alongside along with his co-defendant.”
America can be watching… pic.twitter.com/edJnjGxrXQ
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) February 27, 2025
If Trump was on the Epstein listing, why didn’t Biden launch that information to cease Trump being President?
🤔
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) July 7, 2025
Ben Shapiro says the Division of Justice has put the Epstein thriller to relaxation—declaring there was no shopper listing, no blackmail scheme, no shady fortune, and no homicide.
In keeping with Shapiro, Epstein didn’t make his cash by way of nefarious means, didn’t goal highly effective folks,… pic.twitter.com/8dxE5zTUQn
— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) July 8, 2025
One one that has lengthy insisted there’s a listing, Elon Musk, has been busy questioning why Ghislaine Maxwell — at the moment serving a 20-year jail sentence for conspiring with Epstein to sexually abuse minors — is in jail in any respect. Musk has claimed to have seen this listing and insists Trump is on it, a questionable declare contemplating the FBI information are closely redacted. In keeping with CNN, Julie Okay. Brown, the journalist who first uncovered Epstein, has already stated, “There isn’t any proof Epstein stored a ledger or a listing of shoppers who have been concerned along with his intercourse trafficking operation.”
🤔
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 7, 2025
That is the place the story will get complicated. If there’s anybody to belief on Epstein, it’s Julie Okay. Brown. Her 2018 investigative reporting uncovered Epstein’s seedy world of intercourse crimes in opposition to minors in Florida. Epstein managed to wiggle out of that with a controversial plea deal negotiated by Alex Acosta, which reportedly included “granted immunity to any doable co-conspirators.” Acosta later served as Trump’s Secretary of Labor throughout his first time period.
Julie Okay. Brown took to X to elucidate that the obsession with an alleged “listing” was at all times a crimson herring. The award-winning journalist advised her followers that numerous DOJ and FBI information regarding the case nonetheless haven’t been launched, and people which might be accessible are so closely redacted they’re practically indecipherable. In keeping with Brown, dozens of girls have been interviewed, and inside these information, she hypothesizes, there are certainly names of co-conspirators.
On Epstein: as I’ve written too many instances to rely, there ARE large quantities of FBI/DOJ information that haven’t been launched, or these which might be accessible are so closely blacked out that they’re unreadable. The FBI and DOJ can launch these information (redacting the names of victims)…
— julie okay. brown (@jkbjournalist) July 7, 2025
So whereas most individuals proceed arguing about whether or not the listing exists, that’s precisely the place the Trump administration would like the talk to remain, as a substitute of shifting to the unredacting of the FBI information they have already got.